
In this module, the behavioral ecological systems model was used to depict the various stakeholders involved in research with a focus on community-engaged research. The stakeholders range from policymakers to community members. When designing research to be inclusive of diverse populations, knowing the role and responsibilities of various stakeholders can be important to the overall study design, implementation, and success. Because these stakeholders must intersect, knowing how to navigate the landscape requires understanding and respect.
When research is approved to commence, the process of recruitment, enrollment and data collection begin. At every step are opportunities to demonstrate ethical practices, which provide the foundational support needed to carry out our research responsibly. Staff training is a critical step that must occur before interacting with prospective research participants. The research principal investigator is responsible for training staff or delegating that responsibility to a senior research team member. Research team members (e.g., students, community health workers, patient navigators) may have little or no prior formal training in research design. As such, training in the basic concepts of research is needed to provide the context for the steps detailed in the IRB-approved research plan.

Lastly, the research team should be familiar with the data management plan. This plan should include procedures for collecting, storing and sharing data. Moreover, it should define how data will be analyzed and the extent to which results will be shared with the community partners and research participants.
This last step of sharing research results is addressed in Module 3.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations – Title 45, Public Welfare; Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Published 2018. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (NCPHS). Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Vol 44.; 1979.
What Is the Clinical-Community Relationships Measurement Framework? | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed June 15, 2022. https://www.ahrq.gov/prevention/resources/chronic-care/clinical-community-relationships-measures-atlas/ccrm-atlas3.html
Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development .; 1981.
Minkler M, Blackwell AG, Thompson M, Tamir HB. Community-Based Participatory Research: Implications for Public Health Funding. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1210-1213. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1210
Developing a Community Advisory Board for Research Toolkit | SC CTSI. Accessed June 14, 2022. https://sc-ctsi.org/resources/developing-a-community-advisory-board-for-research-toolkit
Andrews JO, Felton G, Wewers ME, Heath J. Use of community health workers in research with ethnic minority women. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(4):358-365.
Terpstra J, Coleman KJ, Simon G, Nebeker C. The role of community health workers (CHWs) in health promotion research: ethical challenges and practical solutions. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(1):86-93. doi:10.1177/1524839908330809
Nebeker C, Giacinto RE, Pacheco BA, López-Arenas A, Kalichman M. Prioritizing Competencies for “Research” Promotores and Community Health Workers. Health Promot Pract. Published online March 2020:152483992091354. doi:10.1177/1524839920913548
Nebeker C, Kalichman M, Talavera A, Elder J. Training in Research Ethics and Standards for Community Health Workers and Promotores Engaged in Latino Health Research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2015;45(4):20-27. doi:10.1002/hast.471
Nebeker C, Lopez-Arenas A. Building research integrity and capacity (BRIC): Introducing community health workers to the scientific method and ethical research practices. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2016;17:41-45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1020
Balls-Berry JE, Acosta-Pérez E. The use of community-engaged research principles to improve health: Community academic partnerships for research. P R Health Sci J. 2017;36(2):84-85.